Article

    Accounting structure in early-stage biotech companies

    Accounting is infrastructure. If it is weak, everything built on top of it becomes harder.

    By Patrick Dirchsen

    Published 16 August 2026 · biosuite ApS

    Accounting is infrastructure. If it is weak, everything built on top of it becomes harder.

    Early accounting decisions shape how a biotech company reports, from tracking total R&D spend and comparing actuals to budget to preparing board materials accurately. A simple and well-structured setup saves significant time later.

    Keep the chart of accounts simple

    Many startups overcomplicate their chart of accounts. Others make it too detailed in the wrong places.

    Accounts should reflect what the company spends money on, not who spends it or which program it relates to. For example:

    • External research and CRO services
    • Laboratory supplies
    • Salaries and payroll costs
    • Facility and lab rent
    • Professional fees

    Avoid creating separate accounts for every department or target. That level of detail should sit elsewhere in the system.

    A clean structure makes reporting easier, reduces coding errors, and improves budgeting accuracy.

    Use dimensions for programs and departments

    Biotech companies rarely operate with only one activity. Even early-stage teams often work across:

    • General & Administrative (G&A)
    • Research & Development (R&D)
    • Multiple targets or programs

    Instead of creating new accounts for each program, use dimensions such as:

    • Department
    • Program or project
    • Location (if relevant)

    This makes it possible to see:

    • Total R&D spend
    • Spend per target
    • Total G&A cost

    – without duplicating accounts.

    It also prepares the company for a future ERP implementation. Scaling becomes significantly easier when the structure is clean from the beginning.

    Define what belongs where

    Consistency is more important than perfection.

    Each account should have a short internal definition. For example:

    • How different types of CRO work are classified
    • What qualifies as lab consumables

    Better inputs lead to better reporting.

    How structure and dimensions work together in practice

    Below is a simple example of a clean, activity-based chart of accounts supported by structured dimensions. The accounts remain stable, while departments and programs evolve as the organization grows.

    Account no.Account nameDefinition (internal use)Example departments*Example programs
    6100External research servicesCRO, preclinical, analytical servicesR&DTarget A, Target B
    6110Laboratory suppliesConsumables, reagents, small lab equipmentR&DTarget A, Target B
    6200Salaries and payroll costsGross salary, pension, payroll taxesR&D, G&ATarget A, Target B, General
    6300Facility and lab rentOffice and lab spaceR&D, G&AGeneral
    6400Professional feesLegal, audit, consulting (non-scientific)G&AGeneral

    * Department is typically hierarchical, with sub-levels such as Preclinical, Clinical Operations or CMC under R&D.

    Plan for scale, not perfection

    The goal in year one is not to build a public-company finance function. It is to create a structure that can evolve without being rebuilt.

    A well-designed accounting setup should support current reporting needs, allow additional dimensions as programs expand, survive due diligence, and transition smoothly to a larger ERP when needed.

    Rebuilding a chart of accounts during rapid growth or shortly before an audit is costly and disruptive. Investing thought into the structure early is far more efficient.

    Align accounting with procurement

    In biotech, procurement and accounting are tightly connected. High volumes of CRO work, consultants, or lab services create complexity quickly.

    If purchase orders, vendor management, and invoice approvals are handled in spreadsheets and email threads, visibility is lost.

    biosuite is built specifically for biotech teams that need clarity across contracts, vendors, purchase orders, and invoices without unnecessary system complexity. Instead of stitching together documents and emails, everything is connected. It is built to handle multiple departments and programs in line with how biotech companies actually operate.

    The result is simple: better control, cleaner data, and less administrative friction. In biotech, financial clarity supports scientific focus. A strong foundation in both accounting structure and operational workflows makes that possible.

    This article is provided for general informational purposes only and does not constitute accounting, legal, or other professional advice. You should consult qualified advisors before taking action based on this information.